I think it's the opposite. Books love Martingale players because they know they always go bust.Insiders said:1% on small plays
2% on medium plays
5-10 % on Big plays.
Books love to see people that dont increase the size of the wager as they know that the grind along with the vig will get most all of those types of players.
well it all depends if a guy is smart enough to decpiher what is a small play, medium,play, etc....Insiders said:Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But i have been around for many many years with that ratio.
Sure you must pick winners when you get it up out of the mud. But very few people can actaully pick 50% winners. So as the ole farmers say "you must make hay while the sun shines"
I do know that bookmakers laugh when they see someone on the Grind of 1%. They most usually say i wish we had More of the kinds.
Insiders said:Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But i have been around for many many years with that ratio.
Sure you must pick winners when you get it up out of the mud. But very few people can actaully pick 50% winners. So as the ole farmers say "you must make hay while the sun shines"
I do know that bookmakers laugh when they see someone on the Grind of 1%. They most usually say i wish we had More of the kinds.
TheRightSide said:Bankrolls are for the big fish. I don't see how betting 1-2% would ever get you anywhere. I have mde depoits as small as $100. For the normal everyday players I think this is how most of us do it. I will bet all my bankroll sometimes. Why not I play for fun and it's no problem to reload. So all thi bakroll talk I think does not apply to 80% of the people in here. Unless your a pro what difference does it make. Hell Ive went on runs with $50 before.
Insiders said:1% on small plays
2% on medium plays
5-10 % on Big plays.
Books love to see people that dont increase the size of the wager as they know that the grind along with the vig will get most all of those types of players.